No, it's about "wanting to dominate". A big difference. Because it's the why that is illuminating. Why want to dominate reflects a sickening lack of self-worth and a feeling of fundamental weakness. These men are typical emasculated products of our current society.

Something that happened far less in the more tradtional societies of the past. As the various patterns and stations in life were far more set, creating clearer identities and less space for doubt. It's the same void the Tate brothers are tying to capitalise on today, and why philosophers like Aleksandr Dugin are proposing a return to tradition.